Franklin v. Poole, et al (MAG+)

Filing 11

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1.) The plaintiff's 10 objection to the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2.) The 9 Recommendatio n of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3.) Plaintiff's 8 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED; (4.) Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and lack of jurisdiction; (4.) Any outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/31/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION NUE CHEER FRANKLIN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JIMMY POOLE, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:11-cv-320-TMH WO ORDER After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #10) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on September 21, 2011 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #9) filed on September 13, 2011 is adopted; 3. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B) and lack of jurisdiction. 4. Any outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. st DONE this the 31 day of January, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?