McPherson v. Groupon, Inc.

Filing 6

JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Groupon, Inc., and Michael McPherson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lehman, Anthony) [Modified on 5/26/2011 to reflect that this is a "Joint" motion and to add additional filer who was omitted at original time of filing.-DMN]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL McPHERSON, on behalf of
himself and on behalf of a class of
persons and entities similarly situated in
the state of Alabama,
Plaintiff,
v.
GROUPON, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:11-cv-342-SRW

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT GROUPON, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
This Court, having fully considered the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Joint Motion to
extend Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-entitled matter, and for
good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted. Defendant Groupon, Inc.
shall respond to the Complaint (i) 45 days after the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint
or whatever other deadline is set by the transferee court, in the event the JPML grants the MDL
Motion, or (ii) 45 days after service of the JPML’s decision on the MDL Motion to consolidate

EAST\44866782.3

or whatever deadline is set by this Court, in the event the JPML denies the MDL Motion to
consolidate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May _____, 2011

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Hon. Susan Russ Walker

EAST\44866782.3

2