McPherson v. Groupon, Inc.

Filing 6

JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Groupon, Inc., and Michael McPherson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lehman, Anthony) [Modified on 5/26/2011 to reflect that this is a "Joint" motion and to add additional filer who was omitted at original time of filing.-DMN]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL McPHERSON, on behalf of himself and on behalf of a class of persons and entities similarly situated in the state of Alabama, Plaintiff, v. GROUPON, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:11-cv-342-SRW ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT GROUPON, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT This Court, having fully considered the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Joint Motion to extend Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-entitled matter, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted. Defendant Groupon, Inc. shall respond to the Complaint (i) 45 days after the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint or whatever other deadline is set by the transferee court, in the event the JPML grants the MDL Motion, or (ii) 45 days after service of the JPML’s decision on the MDL Motion to consolidate EAST\44866782.3 or whatever deadline is set by this Court, in the event the JPML denies the MDL Motion to consolidate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May _____, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Hon. Susan Russ Walker EAST\44866782.3 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?