Ridley v. Hetzel et al(INMATE 3)

Filing 8

FINAL JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 28 USC § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/22/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION EDWARD RIDLEY, #276808, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv504-MHT (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Done this 22nd day of September, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?