Ridley v. Hetzel et al(INMATE 3)

Filing 8

FINAL JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 28 USC § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/22/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD RIDLEY, #276808,
Petitioner,
v.
GARY HETZEL, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv504-MHT
(WO)

FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is ORDERED and
ADJUDGED that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is dismissed for lack
of jurisdiction.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution
may issue.
The clerk of court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final
judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
Done this 22nd day of September, 2011.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE