Zhang v. Troy University (MAG+)

Filing 75

JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 74 memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Jun Zhang's 73 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate J udge's 63 recommendation is adopted; (3) Defendant Troy University's 33 motion for summary judgment is granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Troy University and against plaintiff Zhang, with plaintiff Zhang taking nothi ng by his complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Zhang, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/23/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JUN ZHANG, Plaintiff, v. TROY UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv770-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Jun Zhang’s objections (doc. no. 73) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 63) is adopted. (3) Defendant Troy University’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 33) is granted. (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Troy University and against plaintiff Zhang, with plaintiff Zhang taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Zhang, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 23rd day of August, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?