Golston v. Enfinger, et al. (INMATE1)
Filing
58
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 51 Recommendation is ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff Anthony Golston's 54 Objections are overruled. (3) Judgment is entered in favo r of defendants Matthew Enfinger and Kerry Williams and against plaintiff Golston, with plaintiff Golston taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Golston, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter thisdocument on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/12/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTHONY GOLSTON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
MATTHEW ENFINGER, C.O. I,
and KERRY WILLIAMS,
Sargeant,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:11cv946-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of
the court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 51) is adopted.
(2) Plaintiff
Anthony
Golston’s
objections
(doc.
no. 54) are overruled.
(3)
Judgment
Matthew
Enfinger
plaintiff
is
Golston,
entered
and
Kerry
with
nothing by his complaint.
in
favor
of
Williams
plaintiff
defendants
and
Golston
against
taking
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff Golston, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 12th day of May, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?