Hammond et al v. The City of Eufaula, Alabama et al
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/26/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist) (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JAMIE L. HAMMOND, formerly
Jamie L. Edmondson, et al.,
J. C. WEST, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-1045-WKW
Before the court is Defendant J. C. West’s Motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings, filed pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc.
# 29.) Defendant West, a former chief of the City of Eufaula Police Department,
contends that Plaintiffs’ federal and state law claims against him “are barred, in
whole” by the court’s Order granting the other Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to
dismiss. (Doc. # 29, at 1.) In response, Plaintiffs adopt the prior arguments they
made in opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 31.) After careful consideration
and Plaintiffs’ having made no new arguments with respect to the claims against Mr.
West, the court finds that Mr. West’s motion is due to be granted for the same reasons
stated in the court’s prior Order (Doc. # 27).
The court also makes one additional finding. In their briefing on the motion
to dismiss, Plaintiffs relied upon the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause.
(Doc. # 25, at 11; see also Doc. # 26, at 11-12.) A due process claim is not plausibly
alleged in the Complaint in any form, however. In fact, the phrase “due process” is
wholly absent from the Complaint , and the law is well established that “[a] plaintiff
may not amend h[is] complaint through argument in a brief opposing summary
judgment.” Gilmour v. Gates, McDonald & Co., 382 F.3d 1312, 1315 (11th Cir.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant J. C. West’s Motion for Judgment
on the Pleadings (Doc. # 29) is GRANTED.
A separate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 26th day of December, 2012.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?