Enfinger v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 20

OPINION and ORDER ordering and adjudging as follows that: (1) the 16 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) the plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Dept of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED w ith prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) the Alabama Dept of Corrections be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and (4) this case with respect to the allegations set forth against defendants Ellington and Smith be and is hereby REFERRED back to the Mag Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/13/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DEENA ENFINGER, AIS # 218216, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv114-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On March 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 16). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff’s claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. The Alabama Department of Corrections be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and 4. This case with respect to the allegations set forth against defendants Ellington and Smith be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Done this the 13 th day of April 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?