Enfinger v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 20

OPINION and ORDER ordering and adjudging as follows that: (1) the 16 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) the plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Dept of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED w ith prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) the Alabama Dept of Corrections be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and (4) this case with respect to the allegations set forth against defendants Ellington and Smith be and is hereby REFERRED back to the Mag Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/13/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DEENA ENFINGER, AIS # 218216,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv114-TMH
(WO)

OPINION and ORDER
On March 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 16). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;

2.

The plaintiff’s claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and

are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3.

The Alabama Department of Corrections be and is hereby DISMISSED as a

defendant in this cause of action; and
4.

This case with respect to the allegations set forth against defendants Ellington

and Smith be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further

proceedings.
Done this the 13 th day of April 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE