Giles v. Auburn University Montgomery, et al

Filing 20

ORDER that defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss is granted to the following extent only: (1) Plaintiff Adrianne Giless Title VII, Family and Medical Leave Act, and Equal Pay Act claims against defendant Michael Burger are dismissed without prejudi ce. These claims remain pending against defendant Auburn University at Montgomery. (2) Plaintiff Giles has 14 days from the date of thisorder to amend her complaint as to her claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 & 1983.No party is terminated. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/11/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

ADRIANNE GILES,
Plaintiff,
v.
AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT
MONTGOMERY, and MICHAEL
BURGER,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:12cv218-MHT
(WO)

ORDER
Based on the representations made during an on-therecord conference call held on May 11, 2012, it is
ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 11)
is granted to the following extent only:
(1) Plaintiff Adrianne Giles’s Title VII, Family and
Medical Leave Act, and Equal Pay Act claims against
defendant Michael Burger are dismissed without prejudice.
These claims remain pending against defendant Auburn
University at Montgomery.

(2) Plaintiff Giles has 14 days from the date of this
order to amend her complaint as to her claims under 42
U.S.C. §§ 1981 & 1983.
No party is terminated.
DONE, this the 11th day of May, 2012.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE