Flournoy v. Harris et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; that Plaintiff's complaint seeking enforcement of prior injunctive orders of the court is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(ii); that Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against Defendants Thomas, Barry, and Edwards are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); that this Plaintiff's S ection 1983 claims against Defendants Thomas, Barry, and Edwards are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 6/4/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DONNELL FLOURNOY, #126 385, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER I. HARRIS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:12-CV-286-TMH ) ) ) ) ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #11) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 1. The Recommendation (Doc. #11) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s complaint seeking enforcement of prior injunctive orders of the court is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 3. Plaintiff’s Section 1983 claims against Defendants Thomas, Barry, and Edwards are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and 3. This case with respect to the remaining defendant is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Done this 4th day of June, 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?