Osburn v. Panetta et al

Filing 128

ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, and the parties having indicated on the record on November 15, 2013, that they do not object, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 126 ) is adopted; (2) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 93 ), the motion for extension of time to complete discovery (doc. no. 93 ), and the supplemental motion to dismiss (doc. no. 97 ) are all denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/18/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SHARON OSBURN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary,
Department of Defense,
(Defense Information
Systems Agency),
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:12cv349-MHT

ORDER
After

an

independent

and

de

novo

review

of

the

record, and the parties having indicated on the record on
November 15, 2013, that they do not object, it is ORDERED
as follows:
(1) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
126) is adopted.
(2) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 93), the motion
for

extension

of

time

to

complete

discovery

(doc. no. 93), and the supplemental motion to
dismiss (doc. no. 97) are all denied.
DONE, this the 18th day of November, 2013.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE