Leslie v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
9
OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: (1) The Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) The plaintiff's claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii); and (3) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/31/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KENNETH D. LESLIE, #156048,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN GARY HETZEL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:12cv420-TMH
OPINION and ORDER
On July 25, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 8). Upon an independent review of the file in
this case and upon consideration of the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.
The Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED;
2.
The plaintiff’s claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii); and
3.
This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of
process.
Done this the 31st day of August 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?