Lohr v. Zehner et al

Filing 49

JUDGMENT as follows: (1) The notice of dismissal 45 is treated as a motion to dismiss and said motion is granted. (2) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation and the claims against it are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Union Pacific Corpora tion is terminated as a party. (3) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation's motion to dismiss 41 is denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RICHARD I. LOHR, II, as ) Administrator of the Estate ) of Charles David Fancher, ) Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH EARL ZEHNER, III, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv533-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The notice of dismissal (doc. no. 45) is treated as a motion to dismiss and said motion is granted. (2) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation and the claims against it are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Union Pacific Corporation is terminated as a party. (3) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 41) is denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 18th day of January, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?