Lohr v. Zehner et al
Filing
49
JUDGMENT as follows: (1) The notice of dismissal 45 is treated as a motion to dismiss and said motion is granted. (2) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation and the claims against it are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Union Pacific Corpora tion is terminated as a party. (3) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation's motion to dismiss 41 is denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
RICHARD I. LOHR, II, as
)
Administrator of the Estate )
of Charles David Fancher,
)
Deceased,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JOSEPH EARL ZEHNER, III,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:12cv533-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) The notice of dismissal (doc. no. 45) is treated
as a motion to dismiss and said motion is granted.
(2) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation and the claims
against it are dismissed without prejudice.
Defendant
Union Pacific Corporation is terminated as a party.
(3) Defendant Union Pacific Corporation’s motion to
dismiss (doc. no. 41) is denied as moot.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 18th day of January, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?