Gillis v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 9

ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) defendant's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED; and (3) this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on plaintiff's claims. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/2/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ALPHONSO GILLIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
J.C. GILES, JOSEPH WRIGHT,
DOROTHY SCOTT, CAROLYN
LONGMIRE, and LINDA NELSON,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-676-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On August 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
(Doc. # 5) regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1). No
timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file in
this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED;

2.

Defendant’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1) is DENIED;

3.

This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further

and

proceedings on Plaintiff’s claims.

DONE this 2nd day of October, 2012.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2