Elmore v. Department of Corrections, et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
15
OPINION and ORDER ORDERING and ADJUDGING as follows: (1) the 12 report and recommendation of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in acco rdance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and the Alabama Department of Corrections be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this action; (3) this case, with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining defendants, be and is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/2/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM ELMORE, III, #129236,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv796-TMH
(WO)
OPINION and ORDER
On October 4, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;
2.
The plaintiff’s claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and
are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and the Alabama Department of Corrections be and is hereby DISMISSED
as a defendant in this action;
3.
This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against the remaining
defendants, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings.
Done this the 2nd day of November 2012.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?