Skipper v. Boyd, et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
16
OPINION AND ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; the Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Boyd and Billups are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii); Defendants Boyd and Billups are DISMISSED as parties to this cause of action, and the Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/6/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JESSE WAYNE SKIPPER, II, #274558,
Plaintiff,
v.
LOUIS BOYD, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-949-TMH
[wo]
OPINION and ORDER
On December 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case
to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 11). Upon an independent review
of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
be and is hereby ADOPTED. The Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Boyd and Billups
are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii). Defendants Boyd and Billups are DISMISSED as
parties to this cause of action, and the Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants
are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
DONE this the 6th day of February, 2013.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?