Smith et al v. City of Montgomery et al

Filing 79

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Dft City of Montgomery's 56 motion for summary judgment is granted; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of dft City of Montgomery and against plfs Carolyn Smith, Isaiah Sm ith, and Antonio Haigler, with said plfs taking nothing by their complaint as to said dft; Dft City of Montgomery is terminated as a party; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the Smith plfs and against plf Haigler, for which execution may i ssue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed; The summary-judgment motion is still pending as to the other dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/26/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, ) (Entered: 06/26/2014)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CAROLYN SMITH; ISAIAH
SMITH; ANTONIO HAIGLER;
and KANESHIA HAIGLER, as
guardian and next friend
of the minor, S.M.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY,
ALABAMA; et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:12cv1037-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered this date,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) Defendant

City

of

Montgomery’s

motion

for

summary judgment (Doc. No. 56) is granted.
(2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City
of

Montgomery

and

against

plaintiffs

Carolyn

Smith,

Isaiah Smith, and Antonio Haigler, with said plaintiffs
taking nothing by their complaint as to said defendant.
Defendant City of Montgomery is terminated as a party.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
the Smith plaintiffs and against plaintiff Haigler, for
which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document

on

the

civil

pursuant

to

Rule

58

docket

of

the

as

a

Federal

final
Rules

judgment
of

Civil

Procedure.
This

case

is

not

closed.

The

summary-judgment

motion is still pending as to the other defendants.
DONE, this the 26th day of June, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE