Thomas v. Wiregrass Construction Co.

Filing 45

FINAL JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court as follows: (1) With respect to all claims in this action, judgment is ENTERED in favor ofDefendant Wiregrass Construction Company, Inc. and against Plaintiff Ruby Thomas, with Plaint iff taking nothing by her claims. (2) Costs are TAXED against Plaintiff Ruby Thomas, for which execution may issue. (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure andto close this file. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/14/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
RUBY THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
WIREGRASS CONSTRUCTION
CO.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1071-MEF
(WO – Do Not Publish)

FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 14, 2014,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court as follows:
(1) With respect to all claims in this action, judgment is ENTERED in favor of
Defendant Wiregrass Construction Company, Inc. and against Plaintiff Ruby Thomas, with
Plaintiff taking nothing by her claims.
(2) Costs are TAXED against Plaintiff Ruby Thomas, for which execution may issue.
(3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket
sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
to close this file.
DONE this the 14th day of January, 2014.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE