Oliver v. Napier et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 23

ORDER adopting the 14 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plf's claims against the Segregation Board of Kilby Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 USC & #167; 1915(e)(2)(B); (2) The Segregation Board of Kilby Correctional Facility is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; and (3) This action with respect to the remaining Dfts is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/19/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID O. OLIVER, #285 230, Plaintiff, v. VICTOR NAPIER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-14-WKW [WO] ORDER Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 14.) Based upon an independent review of the record, the court finds that the Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s claims against the Segregation Board of Kilby Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); (2) The Segregation Board of Kilby Correctional Facility is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; and (3) This action with respect to the remaining Defendants is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. DONE this 19th day of April, 2013. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?