Andrews et al v. Williams et al

Filing 74

JUDGMENT: In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendants John Williams and Jerome McQueen's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Williams and McQueen and against plaintiff Jameisha Andrews, with plaintiff Andrews taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Andrews, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/30/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JAMEISHA ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity, and JEROME McQUEEN, in his individual capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv136-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendants John Williams and Jerome McQueen’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 44) is granted. (2) Judgment Williams and is McQueen entered and in favor against of defendants plaintiff Jameisha Andrews, with plaintiff Andrews taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Andrews, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 30th day of September, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?