Andrews et al v. Williams et al
Filing
74
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendants John Williams and Jerome McQueen's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Williams and McQueen and against plaintiff Jameisha Andrews, with plaintiff Andrews taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Andrews, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/30/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMEISHA ANDREWS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN WILLIAMS, in his
individual capacity, and
JEROME McQUEEN, in his
individual capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv136-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it
is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) Defendants John Williams and Jerome McQueen’s
motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 44) is granted.
(2) Judgment
Williams
and
is
McQueen
entered
and
in
favor
against
of
defendants
plaintiff
Jameisha
Andrews, with plaintiff Andrews taking nothing by her
complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff Andrews, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 30th day of September, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?