Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. et al v. Bentley et al
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the opinions and orders entered in this case, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) It is DECLARED that subsection 4(c) of the Women's Health and Safety Act, 2013 Ala. Acts 79 4(c), codi fied at 1975 Ala. Code 26-23E-4(c), is unconstitutional; (2) judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendants; (3) the 152 & 239 Temporary Restraining Order is vacated as moot; (4) the 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is denied as moot; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against the defs, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/25/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
SOUTHEAST, INC., on behalf
of its patients,
physicians, and staff,
LUTHER STRANGE, in his
official capacity as
Attorney General of the
State of Alabama, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the opinions and orders entered
in this case, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of
the court as follows:
§ 4(c), codified at 1975 Ala. Code § 26-23E-4(c), is
(2) Judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiffs
and against the defendants.
(3) The temporary restraining order (doc. nos. 152
& 239) is vacated as moot.
(4) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no.
3) is denied as moot.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
the defendants, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 25th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?