Thomas v. Cognasi, et al (MAG+)

Filing 25

JUDGMENT, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) the defendants' 3 Motion to Dismis s and alternative 3 Motion for More Definite Statement are granted to the extent that defs Cognasi and Quinn are dismissed in their 'official capacities'; (3) the defs' 3 motion to dismiss and alternative motion for more definite statement are denied in all other respects; none of the defendants is terminated completely from this case; (4) this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/31/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION NELSON L. THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. OFFICER NICHOLAS COGNASI, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv575-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 23), to which no objection has been filed, is adopted. (2) The defendants' motion to dismiss and alternative motion for more definite statement (doc. no. 3) are granted to the extent that defendants Cognasi and Quinn are dismissed in their ‘official capacities.’ (3) The defendants' motion to dismiss and alternative motion for more definite statement (doc. no. 3) are denied in all other respects. None of the defendants is terminated completely from this case. (4) This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. DONE, this the 31st day of March, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?