Bass v. Sconyers (INMATE 2)
Filing
25
ORDER directing that: (1) The Recommendation (Doc. 11 ) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff's claims against the Prison Health Care Unit are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U. S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) The Prison Health Care Unit is DISMISSED as a party to this complaint; and (4) This case with respect to the remaining defendants is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
TOMMY BASS, #122 504,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN KENNETH SCONYERS,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13-CV-594-WHA
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 11) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation (Doc. 11) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s claims against the Prison Health Care Unit are DISMISSED with
prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3. The Prison Health Care Unit is DISMISSED as a party to this complaint; and
4. This case with respect to the remaining defendants is referred back to the
Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
Done this 22nd day of October, 2013.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?