Carey v. Mason et al (INMATE 2)
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) The 78 motion to dismiss plf's due-process claim regarding the 8/23/2013, disciplinaries is granted; (2) Plf's due-process claim is dismissed without prejudice; and (3) This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/17/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS CAREY, #245045,
WARDEN RENE MASON, et al., )
CIVIL ACTION NO.
OPINION AND ORDER
Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to dismiss
He requests dismissal of challenges
August 23, 2013, for an incident which occurred at the
Plaintiff states he wishes to pursue his due-process
challenge regarding the disciplinaries in question in
state court and that he is not abandoning the facts of
his due-process claim.
Upon review of the motion, the
court concludes that the motion should be granted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) The motion to dismiss plaintiff’s due-process
(doc. no. 78) is granted;
without prejudice; and
(3) This case is referred back to the magistrate
judge for additional proceedings.
DONE, this the 17th day of November, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?