Carey v. Mason et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
86
ORDER as follows: (1) the 83 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) plf's 1 request for equitable relief is DISMISSED as moot; (3) the 23 & 66 Motions to Dismiss by defs Siddiq and Moore is GRANTED and the c ase is DISMISSED with prejudice against these defendants under 42 USC 1997e(a) for plf's failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (4) the 34 & 65 Motions for Summary Judgment by defs Thomas, Randolph, King, Mason, Jenkins, and Jackson ar e GRANTED; (5) def Whitley's 34 motion for summary judgment regarding the claim for monetary damages lodged against him in his official capacity is GRANTED; and (6) def Whitley's 34 motion for summary judgment regarding plf's eighth amendment excessive-force claim lodged against him in his individual capacity is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/30/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS CAREY, #245045,
Plaintiff,
v.
RENE MASON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-705-WKW
[WO]
ORDER
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 83.)
There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review
of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 83) is
ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s request for equitable relief (Doc. # 1) is DISMISSED as
3.
The motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Siddiq and Moore (Docs.
moot;
# 23, 66) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice against these
defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his
administrative remedies;
4.
The motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Thomas,
Randolph, King, Mason, Jenkins, and Jackson (Docs. # 34, 65) are GRANTED;
5.
Defendant Whitley’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 34)
regarding the claim for monetary damages lodged against him in his official capacity
is GRANTED; and
6.
Defendant Whitley’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 34)
regarding Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim lodged against him
in his individual capacity is DENIED.
DONE this 30th day of September, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?