Rutledge v. Strange (INMATE 3)
Filing
15
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that: (1) the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus i s denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/28/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JONATHAN LOUIS RUTLEDGE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
LUTHER STRANGE,
Respondent.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv785-TMH
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court that:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is adopted.
(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No.
1) is denied because the required permission has
not
been
obtained
from
the
Eleventh
Circuit
Court of Appeals.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE, this the 28th day of April, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?