Rutledge v. Strange (INMATE 3)

Filing 15

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that: (1) the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus i s denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/28/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JONATHAN LOUIS RUTLEDGE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. LUTHER STRANGE, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv785-TMH (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is adopted. (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 28th day of April, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?