Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 2)
Filing
12
ORDER directing that, after review of the 5 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, it is ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED; Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Thomas i s DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i & ii); Defendant Thomas is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; and this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 12/13/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS CAREY, #245 045,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-799-TMH
)
)
)
)
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 5) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should
be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is hereby
ADOPTED; Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Thomas is DISMISSED with
prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i & ii); Defendant Thomas is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; and
this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
DONE this 13th day of December, 2013.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?