Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Enslen

Filing 15

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Branch Banking and Trust Company's 11 motion for default judgment is granted; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of plf Branch Banking and Trust Company and against dft Robert G. Enslen, Jr.; (3) Plf Branch Banking and Trust Company shall have and recover from dft Enslen the sum of $ 508,790.58; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against dft Enslen, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/31/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, successor in interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as receiver for Colonial Bank, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT G. ENSLEN, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv828-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company’s motion for default judgment (doc. no. 11) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company and against defendant Robert G. Enslen, Jr. (3) Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company shall have and recover from defendant Enslen the sum of $ 508,790.58. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant Enslen, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 31st day of March, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?