Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Enslen
Filing
15
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Branch Banking and Trust Company's 11 motion for default judgment is granted; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of plf Branch Banking and Trust Company and against dft Robert G. Enslen, Jr.; (3) Plf Branch Banking and Trust Company shall have and recover from dft Enslen the sum of $ 508,790.58; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against dft Enslen, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/31/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY, successor in
interest to Colonial Bank
by asset acquisition from
the FDIC as receiver for
Colonial Bank,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT G. ENSLEN, JR.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv828-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered this date,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company’s
motion for default judgment (doc. no. 11) is granted.
(2)
Judgment
is
entered
in
favor
of
plaintiff
Branch Banking and Trust Company and against defendant
Robert G. Enslen, Jr.
(3)
Plaintiff
Branch
Banking
and
Trust
Company
shall have and recover from defendant Enslen the sum of
$ 508,790.58.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
defendant Enslen, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 31st day of March, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?