Harris v. Yelder (INMATE 2)

Filing 31

ORDER that the court adopts the 30 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is ORDERED as follows: 1) These consolidated cases are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to notice under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); 2) All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/3/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION FREDRICK HARRIS, #202 390, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER YELDER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-843-WHA ORDER This is the lead case in three cases, including additionally 2:13-cv-864 and 2:13-cv-894. The consolidated cases are before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 30), entered on April 28, 2014, to which no timely objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge ordered that all Motions to Dismiss (Docs. # 10, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28) in this numbered case be treated as Notices of Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), allowing a plaintiff to file “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment” in order to voluntarily dismiss an action without a court order. This would also apply to Doc. # 11 in Case No. 2:13-cv-864, filed on February 12, 2014, before the consolidation, and the court so orders. The court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 30), and it is ORDERED as follows: 1. These consolidated cases are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 2. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. DONE this 3rd day of June, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?