McCurdy v. Ippolito, et al. (MAG+)

Filing 10

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 9 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The Recommendation o f the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 8 ) is adopted; (3) The individual defendants, as well as the State of Alabama, are DISMISSED as improper parties under this Title VII action, so that only the State of Alabama Disability Determination Service remains; (4) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GWENDOLYN McCURDY, Plaintiff, v. NORMAN IPPOLITO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-934-MEF WO ORDER After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #9) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 24, 2014 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) entered on March 10, 2014 is adopted; 3. The individual defendants, as well as the State of Alabama, are DISMISSED as improper parties under this Title VII action, so that only the State of Alabama Disability Determination Service remains. 4. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. DONE this the 31st day of March, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?