Griffin v. Neptune Technology Group

Filing 87

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The plaintiff's 75 MOTION to Dismiss voluntarily Counts I and IV is granted, and the harassment and hostile-environment claims (as set forth in the motion) are di smissed with prejudice. (2) The plaintiffs claims for disparate treatment under Title VII (Count II) and his claim for retaliatory discharge for filing a workers compensation claim (Count VIII) are dismissed with prejudice. In his response to the pen ding motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff indicated a desire to voluntarily dismiss these claims. (3) The plaintiffs claim that he was improperly denied workers compensation is dismissed with prejudice. In the parties proposed pretrial order, t hey informed the court that they had fully resolved this claim. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgmentpursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/23/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JOSHUA GRIFFIN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
NEPTUNE TECHNOLOGY GROUP,
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv16-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court
as follows:
(1) The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss voluntarily
counts

I

and

IV

(doc.

no.

75)

is

granted,

and

the

harassment and hostile-environment claims (as set forth
in the motion) are dismissed with prejudice.
(2) The plaintiff’s claims for disparate treatment
under

Title

retaliatory
compensation
prejudice.

VII

(Count

discharge
claim

(Count

II)
for

and
filing

VIII)

are

his

claim
a

for

worker’s

dismissed

with

In his response to the pending motion for

summary judgment, the plaintiff indicated a desire to
voluntarily dismiss these claims.
(3)
denied

The plaintiff’s claim that he was improperly
worker’s

prejudice.

compensation

is

dismissed

with

In the parties’ proposed pretrial order,

they informed the court that they had fully resolved
this claim.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document

on

the

civil

pursuant

to

Rule

58

of

docket
the

as

a

Federal

final
Rules

judgment
of

Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 23rd day of December, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Civil