Malone v. Department of the Air Force (MAG+)
Filing
86
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf's 84 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 81 recommendation is adopted; (3) Dfts' 66 motion for summary judgment is granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of dfts and against plf, with plf taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; These cases are closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/24/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
A.D. MALONE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR
FORCE,
Defendant.
A.D. MALONE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR
FORCE and UNITED STATES
AIR FORCE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv670-MHT
(WO)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv699-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's
objections
(doc.
no.
84)
are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 81) is adopted.
(3) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc.
no. 66) is granted.
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her
complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
These cases are closed.
DONE, this the 24th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?