Hare v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
53
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion enteredthis date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plf's 51 Objections are overruled; (2) the 48 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Jduge is adop ted; (3) plf's 29 and 47 Motions for Preliminary Injunction are denied; (4) def's 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (5) judgment is entered in favor of def and against plf, with plf taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/1/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
NILES HAMPTON HARE,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT BENTLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv710-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 51) are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge’s
recommendation (doc. no. 48) is adopted.
(3) Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction
(doc. nos. 29 and 47) are denied.
(4) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc.
no. 34) is granted.
(5) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and
against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his
complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 1st day of February, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?