Noe v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's 22 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 21 recommendation is adopted; (3) The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is den ied because petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/31/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
LEEPOSEY DANIELS, LUTHER
STRANGE, and ALABAMA BOARD
OF PARDONS AND PAROLES,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The petitioner’s objections (doc. no. 22) are
recommendation (doc. no. 21) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.
no. 1) is denied because petitioner failed to
exhaust state remedies.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
the petitioner, for which execution may issue.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 31st day of December, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?