Noe v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 24

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's 22 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 21 recommendation is adopted; (3) The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is den ied because petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/31/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WOODBURCK NOE,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEEPOSEY DANIELS, LUTHER
STRANGE, and ALABAMA BOARD
OF PARDONS AND PAROLES,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv733-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The petitioner’s objections (doc. no. 22) are
overruled.
(2) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge’s

recommendation (doc. no. 21) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.
no. 1) is denied because petitioner failed to
exhaust state remedies.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
the petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The

clerk

of

court

document

on

the

civil

pursuant

to

Rule

58

of

is

DIRECTED

docket
the

as

a

Federal

to

enter

final
Rules

this

judgment
of

Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 31st day of December, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Civil