Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 48

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of thecourt as follows: (1) plfs' 46 objections are overruled; (2) ADOPTING 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge ; (3) def's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defs and against plf, with plf taking nothing by his complaint; (5) no costs are taxed; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/17. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION THURMON E. MOORE II, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and DR. HOOD, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv865-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 46) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 45) is adopted. (3) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 31) is granted. (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. (5) No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 Civil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?