Thomas v. Smith (INMATE 2)
Filing
8
JUDGMENT directing that plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal (doc. no. 6 ) is granted and this case is dismissed without prejudice; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/5/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
KENDALL THOMAS, #132267,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHAPLAIN STEVE SMITH,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv1094-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
alleging
a
state
violations
of
inmate,
his
filed
First
a
and
complaint
Fourteenth
Amendment rights to practice and facilitate the growth
of his religion.
Prior to service of the complaint,
plaintiff filed a document in which he seeks dismissal
of this case.
notice
of
The court construes this document as a
dismissal
pursuant
to
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
41(a)(1)(A)(i), which permits voluntary dismissal by a
plaintiff "before the opposing party serves either an
answer
or
a
motion
for
summary
judgment[.]"
Under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B), such dismissal is “without
prejudice.”
Accordingly, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE
of
the
court
that
plaintiff’s
motion
for
voluntary
dismissal (doc. no. 6) is granted and this case is
dismissed without prejudice.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 5th day of December, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?