United States of America v. Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty One Dollars ($7,861.00) in United States Currency (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 17

DECREE of Forfeiture directing that, for good cause otherwise shown, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion of the United States for a Decree of Forfeiture (doc. no. 16 ) is granted as follows: (1) The United States Marshals Service sha ll release $3,000.00 to Claimant Gary Parker through his counsel of record, Cooper & Cooper; (2) $4,861.00 is forfeited to the United States to be disposed of according to law; (3) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 10 ) is denied as moot; (4 ) Each party will bear their own costs; (5) The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and (6) This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 03/09/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEVEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY ONE DOLLARS ($7,861.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1186-MHT (WO) DECREE OF FORFEITURE Before the Court is the United States of America’s Motion for Decree of Forfeiture. On September 19, 2014, the United States filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (doc. no. 1), pursuant to 21 U.S.C. ' 881(a)(6), alleging that the Defendant currency constitutes monies furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for controlled substances, or represents proceeds of trafficking in controlled substances or was used or intended to be used to facilitate violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (drug distribution) and 21 U.S.C. § 846 (conspiracy to commit a violation of the Controlled Substances Act). It appearing that process was fully issued in this action and returned according to law: Pursuant to a Warrant of Arrest In Rem issued by this Court, the United States Marshals Service for the Middle District of Alabama served the Defendant currency on December 9, 2014 (doc. no. 5); On December 10, 2014, Attorney Jerry L. Thornton was served by the United States Marshals Service with copies of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, Notice of Arrest and Seizure, and Warrant of Arrest In Rem (doc. no. 6); On January 8, 2015, Gary Parker was served by the United States Marshals Service with copies of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, Notice of Arrest and Seizure, and Warrant of Arrest In Rem (doc. no. 15); On December 30, 2014, Gary Parker filed a Verified Claim as to the Defendant currency (doc. no. 7); That on February 12, 2015, the United States and Claimant Gary Parker entered into a Stipulation of Final Settlement (doc. no. 16, attachment 1) in which Claimant consented to entry of a Decree of Forfeiture forfeiting $4,861.00 to the United States to be disposed of according to law. The United States agreed to release $3,000.00 to Claimant Gary Parker, through his counsel of record. That no other claim or answer has been filed on behalf of any other party. Now, therefore, for good cause otherwise shown, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion of the United States for a Decree of Forfeiture (doc. no. 16) is granted as follows: (1) The United States Marshals Service shall release $3,000.00 to Claimant Gary Parker through his counsel of record, Cooper & Cooper; (2) $4,861.00 is forfeited to the United States to be disposed of according to law; (3) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 10) is denied as moot; (4) Each party will bear their own costs; (5) The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and (6) This case is closed. DONE this the 9th day of March, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?