Oliver v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
5
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (2) the 2 motion to Proceed in forma paupe ris is denied; (3) this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/20/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MR. MICHAEL DARNELL
OLIVER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL LUTHER
STRANGE, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv22-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 3) is adopted.
(2) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc.
no. 2) is denied.
(3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 20th day of February, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?