Reynolds et al v. Judicial Correction Services, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MHT)
Filing
55
JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) The joint motion to dismiss defendant City of Clanton (doc no. 54 ) is granted; (2) Counts three and four of the amended complaint (doc. no. 11 ) are dismissed; (3) Defendant City of Clanton is dismissed without p rejudice and terminated as a party, with costs taxed as paid, as further set out; further ORDERED that defendant City of Clanton's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 36 ) is denied as moot; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on June 19, 2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ROXANNE REYNOLDS, RODNEY
WARE, and EDWARD “TYLEE”
WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JUDICIAL CORRECTION
SERVICES, INC., STEVEN
RAYMOND, and CITY OF
CLANTON,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv161-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:
(1) The joint motion to dismiss defendant City of
Clanton (doc no. 54) is granted.
(2) Counts three and four of the amended complaint
(doc. no. 11) are dismissed.
(3) Defendant City of Clanton is dismissed without
prejudice and terminated as a party, with costs taxed
as
paid.
remain.
All
claims
against
all
other
defendants
It
is
further
ORDERED
that
defendant
City
of
Clanton’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 36) is denied as
moot.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
final
Federal
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2015.
_/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?