Reynolds et al v. Judicial Correction Services, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MHT)

Filing 55

JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) The joint motion to dismiss defendant City of Clanton (doc no. 54 ) is granted; (2) Counts three and four of the amended complaint (doc. no. 11 ) are dismissed; (3) Defendant City of Clanton is dismissed without p rejudice and terminated as a party, with costs taxed as paid, as further set out; further ORDERED that defendant City of Clanton's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 36 ) is denied as moot; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on June 19, 2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ROXANNE REYNOLDS, RODNEY WARE, and EDWARD “TYLEE” WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs, v. JUDICIAL CORRECTION SERVICES, INC., STEVEN RAYMOND, and CITY OF CLANTON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv161-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The joint motion to dismiss defendant City of Clanton (doc no. 54) is granted. (2) Counts three and four of the amended complaint (doc. no. 11) are dismissed. (3) Defendant City of Clanton is dismissed without prejudice and terminated as a party, with costs taxed as paid. remain. All claims against all other defendants It is further ORDERED that defendant City of Clanton’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 36) is denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a final Federal Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2015. _/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?