Echols v. Autauga County et al (INMATE 2)
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the Magistrate Judge's 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is adopted; (2) the claims against defs Ricky Causey and LeLarry Smith are dismissed without prejudice and said defs are terminated as parties; (3) the 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to the claims against defs Autauga Couty, Larry Nixon, and David Lyles (aka David Liles); (4) judgment is e ntered in favor of defs Autauga County, Larry Nixon, and David Lyles and against plf, with plf Echols taking nothing by his complaint; (5) no costs are taxed; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/21/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
SCHYLER LEE ECHOLS,
AUTAUGA COUNTY, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
recommendation (doc. no. 23) is adopted.
(2) The claims against defendants Ricky Causey and
LeLarry Smith are dismissed without prejudice and said
defendants are terminated as parties.
(3) The motion for summary judgment (doc. no.
is granted as to the claims against defendants Autauga
County, Larry Nixon, and David Lyles (aka David Liles).
against plaintiff Schyler Lee Echols, with plaintiff
Echols taking nothing by his complaint.
(5) No costs are taxed.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 21st day of September, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?