Joslyn v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
12
JUDGMENT: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 5 recommendation is adopted. (2) Plaintiff's claims against defendants Staton Correctional Facility and Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon w hich relief can be granted, with no costs taxed. (3) Defendants Staton Correctional Facility and Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed and terminated as parties. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. It is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/29/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
JOSLYN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES,
et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv297-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
Upon
an
independent
and
de
novo
review
of
the
record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 5) is adopted.
(2) Plaintiff’s
Correctional
claims
Facility
and
against
defendants
Alabama
Staton
Department
of
Corrections are dismissed for failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted, with no costs taxed.
(3)
Defendants
Staton
Alabama
Department
of
Correctional
Corrections
and
dismissed
are
Facility
and
terminated as parties.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
the
United
States
It is referred back to
Magistrate
Judge
for
further
proceedings.
DONE, this the 29th day of May 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?