Joslyn v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 12

JUDGMENT: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 5 recommendation is adopted. (2) Plaintiff's claims against defendants Staton Correctional Facility and Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon w hich relief can be granted, with no costs taxed. (3) Defendants Staton Correctional Facility and Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed and terminated as parties. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. It is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/29/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOSLYN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv297-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 5) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s Correctional claims Facility and against defendants Alabama Staton Department of Corrections are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, with no costs taxed. (3) Defendants Staton Alabama Department of Correctional Corrections and dismissed are Facility and terminated as parties. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. the United States It is referred back to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 29th day of May 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?