Jacoby v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 53

JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED that: (1) The 52 motion to voluntarily dismiss is granted. (2) All claims against defendants Lt. Bennett and Christopher Gordy are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid, and said defendants are terminated as parties to this action. The court assumes that defendants have no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if there are any objections, they must be filed within seven days from the date of this order. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/4/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRENT JACOBY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER THOMAS, et al., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv367-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), it is ORDERED that: (1) The motion to voluntarily dismiss (doc. no. 52) is granted. (2) All claims against defendants Lt. Bennett and Christopher Gordy are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid, and said defendants are terminated as parties to this action. The court assumes that defendants have no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if there are any objections, they must be filed within seven days from the date of this order. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 4th day of April, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?