Cawthon v. Hemingway, et al. (INMATE 3)
OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 90 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) plf's 87 Motion for Writ of Mandamus is denied; further ORDERING that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/22/17. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID A. CAWTHON,
MELISSA HEMINGWAY, et al., )
sued in their
individual and official
CIVIL ACTION NO.
OPINION AND ORDER
The plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed this case
§§ 551-559, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), challenging the adequacy
of the Montgomery Federal Prison Camp’s law library,
typewriters with memory and replace them with simple
This case is before the court on the
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
that plaintiff’s “motion for a writ of mandamus” be
There are no objections to the recommendation.
Upon an independent and de novo review of the record,
it is ORDERED as follows:
Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 90) is adopted.
(doc. no. 87) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred
back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 22nd day of August, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?