Sanders v. Cooke et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 19

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiffs objections (doc. no. 17 ) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 13 ) is adopted. (3) All claims against defendan t Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed, and it is terminated as a party to this case. (4) The case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings with respect to the claims against the remaining defendant. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/24/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION COREY R. SANDERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MATTHEW COOKE and ALABAMA ) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv566-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 17) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 13) is adopted. (3) All claims against defendant Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed, and it is terminated as a party to this case. (4) The case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings with respect to the claims against the remaining defendant. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a final Federal Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 24th day of November, 2015. _ /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?