Wells Fargo Bank v. Max Keith Norman Residential Design, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
CONSENT JUDGMENT: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. The joint motion for entry of consent judgment and order (doc. no. 21 ) is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and against defendants Ma x Keith Norman Residential Design, Inc., Max Keith Norman, and Hope M. Norman, jointly and severally, in the amount of $122,838.51. 3. Defendants' counterclaim (doc. nos. 10 , 15 ) is dismissed with prejudice. 4. The costs of this actio n are taxed as paid. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/7/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WELLS FARGO BANK, National )
MAX KEITH NORMAN
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN, INC., )
MAX KEITH NORMAN, and HOPE )
CIVIL ACTION NO.
This cause is before the court on the “Joint Motion
for Entry of Consent Judgment and Order” (doc. no. 21)
Association ("Wells Fargo") and defendants Max Keith
Norman Residential Design, Inc. ("MKN"), and Max Keith
Norman and Hope M. Norman (collectively, the "Normans,"
consideration of the parties' filings and the pleadings
in this action, the court finds that the motion should
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED
Findings of Fact
guaranteed by the Normans.
agreed to loan MKN certain sums of money in exchange
for Defendants' promise to make payments to Wells Fargo
agreed under the loan documents.
demanded payment of all amounts due by Defendants under
the loan documents.
Defendants failed to repay Wells Fargo any amounts due
under the loan documents.
(doc. no. 1) with this court on October 6, 2015 seeking
recovery of $116,057.22, together with and including,
without limitation, all attorneys' fees and court costs
incurred by Wells Fargo in enforcing its rights under
the loan documents.
(doc. no. 10) on October 29, 2015, which was amended on
November 24, 2015 (docs. no. 15).
Defendants consent to entry of judgment against
them for $122,838.511, with interest to run on said
judgment at the applicable post-judgment rate.
Based on the above findings of fact, the record in
ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:
The joint motion for entry of consent judgment
This amount is greater than the amount sought
in the complaint due to accruing interest.
Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Wells
defendants Max Keith Norman Residential Design, Inc.,
severally, in the amount of $122,838.51.
Defendants' counterclaim (doc. nos. 10, 15) is
dismissed with prejudice.
The costs of this action are taxed as paid.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 7th day of November, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?