Wilson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 21

ORDERED that (1) The 14 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Plf's claims against Young Boozer, the State Fire Marshall, the Public Health Department, the State Personnel Department, and the Public Safety Department are DISMISSED with prejudice purs uant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) Young Boozer, the State Fire Marshall, the Public Health Department, the State Personnel Department, and the Public Safety Department are DISMISSED as dfts in this cause; and (4) This case, with respect to the claims against Jefferson S. Dunn and Louis Boyd, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/12/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ERIC WILSON, # 187180, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-770-WKW ORDER On January 20, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 14.) Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that (1) The Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff’s claims against Young Boozer, the State Fire Marshall, the Public Health Department, the State Personnel Department, and the Public Safety Department are § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. (3) Young Boozer, the State Fire Marshall, the Public Health Department, the State Personnel Department, and the Public Safety Department are DISMISSED as defendants in this cause; and (4) This case, with respect to the claims against Jefferson S. Dunn and Louis Boyd, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 12th day of February, 2016. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?