Joseph v. Crenshaw County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
8
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 5 recommendation is adopted. (2) All claims against defendant Crenshaw County Jail are dismissed, and it is terminated as a party to this case. (3) The case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings with respect to the claims against the remaining defendants. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/24/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
HARRY JOSEPH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CRENSHAW COUNTY JAIL,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv772-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 5) is adopted.
(2) All claims against defendant Crenshaw County
Jail are dismissed, and it is terminated as a party to
this case.
(3) The case is referred back to the magistrate
judge for further appropriate proceedings with respect
to the claims against the remaining defendants.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
final
Federal
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 24th day of November, 2015.
_ /s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?