Hill v. State Department of Education et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Filing
23
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plfs' 21 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 4 recommendation is adopted, but for the reasons stated in the opinion; (3) Plf's First A mendment claim is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim; (4) Plf's state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to refile in state court; (5) No costs are taxed; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; These cases are closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/13/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
LISA HILL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.
LISA HILL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv852-MHT
(WO)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv342-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiffs’
objections
(doc.
no.
21)
are
overruled.
(2)
The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 14) is adopted, but for the
reasons stated in the opinion.
(3) Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim is dismissed
without prejudice for failure to state a claim.
(4) Plaintiff’s
state-law
claims
are
dismissed
without prejudice and with leave to refile in state
court.
(5) No costs are taxed.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
These cases are closed.
DONE, this the 13th day of January, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?