Cromartie v. The Law Office of Bush and Faulk, PLLC et al(MAG+)

Filing 11

ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 10 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama; 4) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the appropriate steps to effectuate the remand. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/8/2016. Copy mailed to Circuit Clerk (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
STACIA CROMARTIE,
Plaintiff,
v.
E. PEYTON FAULK, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-83-WHA

ORDER
On February 16, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc.
# 5) to which Plaintiff filed an objection (Doc. # 10). The court has conducted an
independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to
which objection is made.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

The Recommendation’s

analysis is sound, and Plaintiff’s objection lacks merit.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 10) is OVERRULED.

2.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED.

3.

This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Montgomery

County, Alabama.

2

4.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the appropriate steps to

effectuate the remand.
DONE this 8th day of March, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2