Cromartie v. The Law Office of Bush and Faulk, PLLC et al(MAG+)

Filing 11

ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 10 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama; 4) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the appropriate steps to effectuate the remand. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/8/2016. Copy mailed to Circuit Clerk (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION STACIA CROMARTIE, Plaintiff, v. E. PEYTON FAULK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-CV-83-WHA ORDER On February 16, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 5) to which Plaintiff filed an objection (Doc. # 10). The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The Recommendation’s analysis is sound, and Plaintiff’s objection lacks merit. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 10) is OVERRULED. 2. The Recommendation (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED. 3. This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama. 2 4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the appropriate steps to effectuate the remand. DONE this 8th day of March, 2016. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?