Smith v. U.S. Agencies (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 13

FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that (1) Plaintiff Peter James Smiths federal claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED with pr ejudice, and judgment is ENTERED on those federal claims in favor of Defendant U.S. Agencies and against Plaintiff Peter James Smith; and (2) Plaintiff Peter James Smiths state law claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED without prejudic e pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/14/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PETER JAMES SMITH, Plaintiff, v. U.S. AGENCIES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-CV-218-WKW FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that (1) Plaintiff Peter James Smith’s federal claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED with prejudice, and judgment is ENTERED on those federal claims in favor of Defendant U.S. Agencies and against Plaintiff Peter James Smith; and (2) Plaintiff Peter James Smith’s state law claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 14th day of December, 2016. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?