Thornton v. Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. et al
Filing
43
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Default judgment is entered in favor of plf Christopher Thornton and against dfts Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. and Douglas Gurney on plf Thornton's complaint; (2) Dfts Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. and Gurney have violated and continue to violate Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 USC 12181, et seq., and its implementing regulations, see 28 C.F. R. Part 36, through their operation of their business, 1048 Blues and Jazz, and through the condition of their property, 1104 East Fairview Ave, Montgomery, Alabama 36106, in the design of parking lot, the entranceways from the parking lot to and thr oughout the music/entertainment areas and service areas, the bathrooms, the paths of travel, and the common areas; (3) Dfts Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. and Gurney, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and all other p ersons who are in active concert or participation with them and who receive actual notice of this judgment are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from failing, by 9/29/2017, to make repairs sufficient to cure the following defects and thus to bring their facili ty at 1104 East Fairview Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama, into compliance with the provisions of the ADA, as further set out in judgment; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against dfts Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. and Gurney, for which exec ution may issue; Should plf Thornton seek attorney's fees (not already awarded) as the prevailing party in this litigation, plf Thornton should file an appropriate motion for such fees; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil doc ket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; DIRECTING the clerk to serve a copy of this default judgment and injunction, as well as copies of the other judgment and opinion entered today, on dfts Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. and Gurn ey by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/24/2017. (furn: calendar, ag) (term: PTC for 03/08/2018; Non-Jury Trial for 04/16/2018) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER THORNTON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATES, INC. and
DOUGLAS GURNEY,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv347-MHT
(WO)
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Default
judgment
is
entered
in
favor
of
plaintiff Christopher Thornton and against defendants
Hospitality
Management
Associates,
Inc.
and
Douglas
Gurney on plaintiff Thornton’s complaint.
(2) Defendants Hospitality Management Associates,
Inc. and Gurney have violated and continue to violate
Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
42
U.S.C.
§ 12181,
et
seq.,
and
its
implementing
regulations,
see
28
C.F.R.
Part
36,
through
their
operation of their business, 1048 Blues and Jazz, and
through
the
condition
of
their
property,
1104
East
Fairview Ave, Montgomery, Alabama 36106, in the design
of parking lot, the entranceways from the parking lot
to
and
throughout
the
music/entertainment
areas
and
service areas, the bathrooms, the paths of travel, and
the common areas.
(3) Defendants
Inc.
and
Gurney,
Hospitality
their
Management
officers,
Associates,
agents,
servants,
employees, and attorneys and all other persons who are
in active concert or participation with them and who
receive actual notice of this judgment are ENJOINED and
RESTRAINED from failing, by September 29, 2017, to make
repairs sufficient to cure the following defects and
thus
to
bring
their
facility
at
1104
East
Fairview
Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama, into compliance with the
provisions of the ADA:
(a)
There
is
no
route to enter the facility;
2
handicapped
accessible
(b) There is no ADA accessible entrance;
(c) There is no ADA accessible route from
the entrance to and throughout the facility;
(d)
There
is
no
ADA
accessible
route
throughout the dining areas including the raised/sunken
area and outdoor dining area;
(e) The restroom is not accessible because
there is not 18 inches of clear floor space on the
latch side of the door;
(f)
The
urinal
is
not
ADA
accessible
because there is not 36 inches of clear floor space for
a forward approach;
(g) The water closet is not accessible,
because the centerline of the toilet is too far from
the side wall (21 inches);
(h) There is no 5 % ADA accessible seating
in the outside dining area;
(i) The mirror and coat hook are too high;
(j)
The
toilet
room
door
is
not
self-closing and fails to have door pulls located on
3
both sides;
(k) The toilet paper dispenser restricts
the delivery of a continuous flow of paper;
(l)
The
soap
dispenser
requires
tight
grasping, twisting, and/or pinching of the wrist.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
defendants Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. and
Gurney, for which execution may issue. Should plaintiff
Thornton seek attorney’s fees (not already awarded) as
the
prevailing
Thornton
party
should
file
in
an
this
litigation,
appropriate
motion
plaintiff
for
such
fees.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
The clerk of court is further DIRECTED to serve a
copy of this default judgment and injunction, as well
as copies of the other judgment and opinion entered
today, on defendants Hospitality Management Associates,
4
Inc.
and
Gurney
by
certified
mail,
return
receipt
requested.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 24th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?